![]() I am sure there are some minor things that could be improved but everything I discovered to date has been dealt with in updates/newer versions. DWR's customer/technical support is by far the best I have ever dealt with - period - for ANY software/hardware company in over 35 years of my work experience. It is easy to create large document productions. The binder system makes it easy to save search results in an intuitive manner that is easy to explain and document for other reviewers. In the instances where I am unable to troubleshoot an issue myself, DWR's support time is extremely responsive and has the knowledge base to resolve my issues quickly.ĭigital WarRoom's platform is similar to Office and other apps as far as optics - ribbons, common keyboard shortcuts (Ctrl-C for copy, Ctrl-A for select all, etc.) making it easy to use/learn. I have the ability to easily load, review, and search multiple large document collections, and run multiple document productions of any size with limited or no technical issues. A copy of the chats can be found here.Comments: DWR is the best e-discovery platform I have ever used (compared to extensive experience with Summation iBlaze, Summation Pro, and average experience with Relativity, and limited experience with Concordance). The LUNA 2.0 airdrop was messy, with numerous investors getting few tokens than they deserved. Terra has encountered numerous mishaps since its restart and even after the launch of Terra 2.0. The confusion didn’t end in the war room. Interestingly, after all the plans were drawn, Do Kwon was still the guy to give the go-ahead for the restart. The goal of your war room could be any combination of the following: Improving project communication Solving one or more problems Mitigating risk Updating everyone’s status IT war rooms, specifically, often aim to pinpoint a tech problem’s root cause. “Can someone summarize the issue? I’m pretty confused.” War rooms can be a useful tool in any type of project management. Meanwhile, Do Kwon was all confused and asking for clarification, “Never seen more confusion on something this serious.” It turns out that even after the lengthy discussion, some members were still in dark about what was happening.Ĭoinbase Cloud’s shot out a comment saying, An uncoordinated restart would result in database corruption. The blockchain had earlier been shut down due to the crash. More confusion arose about when exactly the Terra blockchain was to restart the chain or not. It would be an algorithmic stablecoin backed by crypto. According to the discussion leaked, the said stablecoin would reflect a similar stablecoin proposed in a paper by Cardano’s developer team, the IOHK. There have been rumors about Do Kwon and Terraform Labs planning this of late. The conversation, while often conflicted, touched on a future plan to create a new stablecoin for LUNA 2.0. Every single day that would have passed the multiplicator would have gone down.” The projects on the chain are multiplicators of community value. Protocols were thinking about moving to other chains or starting their own L1s. “I think it was urgent and every day that passed by value was drifting away. To make matters worse, there was a sense of urgency for the group to reach an agreement to create a new Terra chain. One would have expected that Do Kwon, being the founder and controller of Terraform Labs, would have taken the reins to steer the group to a solution. According to the validator going by the name THORmaximalist, the group laced proper leadership and a member opined that they should be moderated by the top 5 validators.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |